Independent food hygiene lookupOfficial FSA records · No paid rankings
Check Food Hygiene
Menu
Check a postcodeFind a businessBrowse townsCompare ratingsFor food businessesHow ratings workUK ratings report

Free operator tool · no account

Review the systems behind your food hygiene rating.

This checklist helps a food-business operator organise an internal review before speaking to the local authority. It cannot reproduce an officer’s inspection, certify compliance or guarantee any rating.

Private working checklist

Your documented review

Selections stay in this browser. They are not uploaded, shared with a council or used to predict a rating.

0/16items reviewed
Food-safety management

Your written system should describe what the business actually does—not a generic folder that nobody follows.

The 4Cs in daily practice

Inspectors look at practice as well as documents. Tick an item only when it happens consistently.

Allergens and traceability

Ingredient information must remain accurate when recipes, suppliers or substitutions change.

Premises, people and pests

Condition and cleanliness form a distinct part of the published hygiene rating.

This is not an inspection pass/fail test. Unticked items are prompts for discussion with the responsible person or local authority—not proof of non-compliance.

What this checklist covers

It follows the main responsibilities described in current government guidance: a food-safety management system based on HACCP principles, hygiene controls, allergen management, suitable training, traceability and action when food is unsafe.

The FSA’s Safer Food, Better Business materials group practical controls around cross-contamination, cleaning, chilling, cooking and management. Northern Ireland provides separate Safe Catering guidance, while MyHACCP is aimed particularly at small food manufacturers with more complex processes.

What it deliberately does not do

There is no score, predicted rating or certificate. The correct controls depend on the business, food, customers, suppliers, premises and processes. An authorised officer may identify issues that cannot be captured in a generic web checklist.

After an inspection, work from the officer’s findings. An appeal disputes whether the rating reflected standards at the inspection; a right to reply explains relevant circumstances or improvements; a requested revisit follows completed improvements. They are different routes.

Primary guidance

Continue with the official material.

Reviewed 6 September 2026. Check the relevant nation and your local authority before relying on a process.

For food-business operators

Use the rating as a starting point—not a compliance plan.

Check the official record first. Training, software and insurance are separate commercial decisions and cannot change an inspection result shown here.

Read official food-business responsibilities →